Trump's Pentagon SERVED with BRUTAL RULING by Federal Judge

Attorneys Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian break down the federal court ruling that struck down the Pentagon's restrictive press credentialing policy as unconstitutional. Judge Paul Friedman ruled that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's rules — which required reporters to pledge not to gather or report on information that hadn't been officially cleared for release, even unclassified material — violated both the First and Fifth Amendments. The court found the policy was "viewpoint discrimination" designed to "weed out disfavored journalists" and replace them with outlets that were "on board and willing to serve" the administration. Nearly every major news organization, including the New York Times, AP, CNN, and even Fox News, had refused to sign the policy and forfeited their Pentagon credentials in protest, while pro-Trump personalities like Laura Loomer and James O'Keefe were given access. Brian and Shant walk through the vagueness of the rules — terms like "unauthorized access disclosure" and "security risk" that were left deliberately undefined to give Hegseth total discretion — and why the judge relied on precedent going back to the 1970s to show this is settled, well-established constitutional law. The court ordered the immediate reinstatement of seven New York Times reporters and vacated the policy for all affected journalists.

Kabateck LLPCall 184474CIVIL for a free case evaluation or visit us at

Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community

Become a member of the Legal AF Substack

Follow Legal AF on Bluesky

Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky

Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here

Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here

Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here

Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here