January 9, 2026
1,530
57
4
3.99%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
MK True Crime hosts Mark Eiglarsh and Jonna Spilbor join the show to discuss the trial of Adrian Gonzales, the former Uvalde, Texas School District Police Officer, who is charged with 29 counts of child endangerment and abandonment after 19 children and two teachers were killed in a mass shooting at Robb Elementary in 2022, the many parallels to Mark’s time representing Scot Peterson, the officer charged in the Parkland, Florida school shooting in 2018, why horrific autopsy photos were admitted to be used by the prosecution in this case, and why the outcome of this trial could set a precedent going forward.
Follow MK True Crime on all social platforms:
Officer charged with criminal negligence for inactivity
Police chief politically sacrificed officers to deflect blame
Criminal charges against officers constitute injustice
Prosecutors privately questioned the charging decision
Officers faced communication failures and cognitive limitations
Officer took appropriate actions including alerting others and helping children
Prosecution will use autopsy photos to manipulate jury emotions
Judge wrongly allowed autopsy photos; prosecution case is weak
Prosecution using inflammatory tactics to compensate for weak case
Judge's instructions about sympathy are meaningless
Conviction could result in severe cumulative sentences
Conviction would set harmful precedent for law enforcement
Officers face impossible circumstances; most are good people
Officers should not face criminal charges for mistakes
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.