November 21, 2023
66,865
276
364
0.96%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
2:19Now PlayingThree federal appeals court judges grilled Donald Trump attorney John Sauer Monday about his bid to nix the partial gag order imposed on the former president in the federal 2020 election subversion case against him, before expressing openness to narrowing its scope. NY Post Reporter Ryan King shares this story.
The panel ultimately adjourned until Nov. 30 without immediately ruling on the 77-year-old’s request, but their lines of questioning left clues that they could pursue a middle-ground approach.
Sauer premised his argument on Trump’s First Amendment rights while underscoring how the order could affect his 2024 presidential campaign.
“The order is unprecedented and it sets a terrible precedent for future restrictions on core political speech,” the attorney said in his opening remarks.
“Would your position be any different if it were a year ago?” Circuit Judge Patricia Millett, a Barack Obama appointee, pressed Sauer at one point.
Read more at
#donaldtrump #appeals #court
The New York Post is your source for breaking news, news about New York, sports, business, entertainment, opinion, real estate, culture, fashion, and more.
Subscribe to New York Post Sports
Catch the latest news here
Follow The New York Post on:
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.