Open to Debate
@opentodebate·282K subscribers·1.7K videos
Debating The Constitution: Technology and Privacy
Posted
June 12, 2017
Views
11,661
Likes
140
Comments
29
Engagement
1.45%
June 12, 2017
11,661
140
29
1.45%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:31:29Now PlayingDo you have a secret that no one else knows? What about Apple, Google, Facebook, Verizon, or Uber? Are you sure they don’t know your secret? Digital data – emails, text messages, phone records, location records, web searches – contain traces of almost every secret. They also contain traces of almost every crime. Tech companies may promise to protect our data from prying eyes. But should that promise yield to law enforcement and national security?
FOR THE MOTION:
Stewart Baker, Attorney & Fmr. Assistant Secretary for Policy, Department of Homeland Security
John Yoo, Law Professor, Berkeley & Fmr. Attorney, Justice Department
AGAINST THE MOTION:
Michael Chertoff, Executive Chairman, The Chertoff Group & Fmr. Secretary of Homeland Security
Catherine Crump, Acting Dir., Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic & Prof., Berkeley Law
MODERATOR: John Donvan
===================================
Official site
Open to Debate Twitter
Open to Debate Facebook
===================================
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
