Open to Debate
Open to Debate
@opentodebate·282K subscribers·1.7K videos

Do parents or peer groups matter more in a child’s development? || Debate Clip

Posted

November 14, 2019

Views

3,230

Likes

25

Comments

1

Engagement

0.80%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Responding to a question about whether parents or peer groups matter more in child development, Nancy Segal from Cal State Fullerton argues peers do have an influence, and Paige Harden from UT Austin adds that parents play a substantial role in choosing their kid’s social situation. An excerpt from the debate "Parenting Is Overrated."

FOR THE MOTION:

Robert Plomin - Professor of Behavioral Genetics, King’s College London

Nancy Segal - Professor of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton & Director, Twin Studies Center

AGAINST THE MOTION:

Paige Harden - Psychology Professor, University of Texas

Ann Pleshette Murphy - Author & Parenting Expert

===================================

Cast Your Vote

Official site

IQ2US Twitter

IQ2US Facebook

===================================

Guests & Subjects Covered

Nancy SegalCal State FullertonPaige HardenUT AustinPsychology Professor UniversityTexas Ann Pleshette MurphyParenting ExpertIQUS Twitter IQUS Facebook

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Do parents or peer groups matter more in a child’s development? || Debate Clip · Open to Debate · Sentinel