Open to Debate
@opentodebate·282K subscribers·1.7K videos
Live Debate Q&A: Joe Patrice, senior editor for Above the Law
Posted
June 6, 2023
Views
159
Likes
1
Engagement
0.63%
June 6, 2023
159
1
0.63%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:11Now PlayingOriginalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
#constitution #abovethelaw #law #supremecourtjudgment
===================================
Official site
Open to Debate Apple Podcasts
Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts
===================================
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
