May 3, 2013
6,515
45
5
0.77%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
10:04Now PlayingChris Cole gives his argument against the use of drone warfare.
SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ►
Oxford Union Website @
Chris begins by saying that he wants to make 3 simple points during his speech. The first of which is that Drones are ethically different from other weapons in that they lower the cost of engaging in lethal military action. The second issue is the myth of the accuracy of these drones and the idea that they can magically erase bad people from the face of the earth. The last issue he wants to challenge is the motion of drones being ethical and effective.
Chris highlights that because these drones are constantly surveying areas of suspicion it makes the option of lethal military force all too easy. He mentions the playstation effect saying that the drone operator is geographically and emotionally distant from the target that is lowers the threshold of reality
Filmed on Thursday 25th April 2013
MOTION: THIS HOUSE BELIEVES DRONE WARFARE IS ETHICAL AND EFFECTIVE
ABOUT CHRIS COLE:
Chris Cole is is founder of Drone Wars UK and blogs at dronewarsuk.wordpress.com
ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY:
The Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. It has been established for 189 years, aiming to promote debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.