Kalam Debate: @CapturingChristianity vs. @rationalityrules - Steve's Second Rebuttal
October 26, 2020
75,505
4,221
1,678
7.81%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Rationality Rules Episodes Around October 26, 2020
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
23:09Now PlayingKalam Debate: @CapturingChristianity vs. @rationalityrules - Steve's Second Rebuttal
Segments
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelTo support me on Patreon (thank you)
To support me through PayPal (thank you)
My new channel, DEBUNKED
To visit the DEBUNKED card game website
To support me through merchandise
o follow me on Facebook
To tweet with me on Twitter
–
Cam’s Kalam:
1) There is a first cause.
2) If there is a first cause, then God exists.
3) God Exists.
Script:
–
References:
1) Kalam Debate@Capturing Christianity vs. @Rationality Rules Cam's Opening Statement
2) Modus Ponens | Logic Good and Bad
3) An Introduction to Philosophy | Stanford University
4). José Bernadette | An Essay in Metaphysics, 1964.
5). Alexander Pruss | Infinity, Causation, and Paradox, pg4.
6). Alexander Pruss | Causal Finitism and the Kalaam Argument, Pgs 2, 3, 4: alexanderpruss.com/papers/kalaam.pdf
7). Graham Oppy | Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity, pg 88, 89.
#RationalityRules #CapturingChristianity #Kalam
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.