Liberal hypocrisy on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
April 5, 2015
3,510
112
24
3.87%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Rebel News Episodes Around April 5, 2015
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
9:25Now PlayingLiberal hypocrisy on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelWhen Bill Clinton passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act 1993, the left loved it. It was used to protect religious minorities like Muslims, Sikhs and Native Americans.
Now a similar bill in Indiana is creating a furor. The left has figured out that Christians could use it to protect their rights to freedom of religion and association. CEOs like Apple's Tom Cook are loudly denouncing the Act as "homophobic," because Christian bakers could use it to argue in court that they shouldn't be forced to made a gay wedding cake.
This backlash is especially hypocritical because last year, Apple started doing business in homophobic, misogynist Saudi Arabia, where gay people like him have bigger problems than wedding cakes,
Let's be clear: The backlash against the Indiana law isn't a pro-gay campaign -- it is anti-Christian.
JOIN TheRebel.media for more news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
READ Ezra Levant’s bestselling book about the war on freedom of speech:
Shakedown: How Government is Undermining Democracy in the Name of Human Rights
FIGHT BACK against anti-Christian bigotry in the public square at ForCanada.ca
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.