August 27, 2015
9,424
114
13
1.35%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:03Now PlayingJohn Robson of TheRebel.Media, on August 27, 1776, William Howe didn’t capture George Washington and end the American Revolution. But he could have, following his victory at Brooklyn Heights. Instead, Howe demonstrated a lack of energy that would characterize his tenure as British military commander in America.
Lazy, drunk or incompetent? Hardly. Howe was a distinguished officer beforehand and afterward. But he was also an MP who publicly questioned the justice or prudence of crushing the revolt. When duty called, he answered anyway.
But just possibly he, and his admiral brother Richard, didn’t really try to win the Revolutionary War because they didn’t really want to. Instead, in a highly awkward position, they did their duty and did well by their men, but that was it, on purpose.
I don’t care for conspiracy theories. But how else can one explain Howe’s behaviour, other than to raise a glass to a man who “threw” a war because he was a patriot who also loved liberty?
The NDP doesn’t want you to see these candidates’ crazy anti-oil tweets!
SIGN UP to get new DeletedTweets.ca every day!
SIGN UP FREE for exclusive Election 2015 coverage from The Rebel team!
JOIN OUR CROWDFUNDING CAMPAIGN to bring you fearless Canadian election reporting!
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.