July 18, 2026
60,180
5,051
272
8.85%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Episode Timeline
Every episode in order around the one you’re watching — click any card and the page flips straight to it.
14:41Now PlayingProton MailGet FREE encrypted email at
The Soviet MiG-23 “Flogger” was supposed to be one aircraft that could do everything: intercept NATO bombers, operate from rough forward airfields, fight on the front line, and bring the Soviet fighter force into the missile age.
So why does it have such a mixed reputation?
In this video, we look at the MiG-23’s swing-wing design, its role as a fast interceptor, why it was not really built to fight like an F-16, and how Soviet doctrine shaped the aircraft. We also cover the MiG-23’s export variants, its ground-attack descendants, and why the U.S. secretly flew captured MiGs under Project Constant Peg to train American pilots against the real thing.
The MiG-23 was not garbage. It was dangerous. But it was also an aircraft with an identity crisis: part interceptor, part dragster, part front-line knife fighter.
For uncensored video, check out my substack at:
Find the Global Warning Podcast on:
Apple Podcasts
Like my shirts? Get your own at:
Want a personalized greeting:
Watch all of my long form videos:
Twitter:
@ryanmcbeth
Instagram:
@therealryanmcbeth
BlueSky
@ryanmcbeth
Reddit:
/r/ryanmcbeth
Join the conversation:
Want to send me something?
Ryan McBeth Productions LLC
8705 Colesville Rd.
Suite 249
Silver Spring, MD 20910
USA
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.