March 3, 2023
7,995
1,009
121
14.13%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
11:36Now PlayingA Texas district judge is set to rule in a case that could have even greater practical implications for abortion access across the country than the overturning of Roe v Wade. Several anti-abortion groups and doctors have filed suit against the FDA, claiming that the original 2000 approval of mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in a medical abortion, was handled improperly. Harry explains what to watch for as the case unfolds.
–
TALKING FEDS PODCAST is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.
New episodes every week! Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Apple Podcasts
Make sure to SUBSCRIBE!
Harry’s Twitter
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
BECOME A PATREON MEMBER
CONTACT US
Contact forms
Email: talkingfedspodcast@gmail.com
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.