April 14, 2026
13,491
285
41
2.42%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
11:20Now PlayingThis is an excerpt from a Members Only episode #314 of the Fifth Column. Watch the full episode only on Substack
Sarah Isgur argues that the Supreme Court is far less neatly ideological than the popular 6-3 narrative suggests. She breaks down why unanimous rulings often get ignored, why process matters more than partisan outcomes, and why even Ruth Bader Ginsburg had doubts about the legal foundation of Roe. It is a sharp look at how the Court actually works, and why so much of the public conversation about it misses the point
--
Hosted by journalists Kmele Foster, Michael Moynihan, and Matt Welch, The Fifth Column provides a weekly rhetorical assault on the news cycle, the people who make it, and occasionally themselves.
Get our free newsletter & access to exclusive content:
Listen to the audio version of the show:
Apple Podcasts
Follow:
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.