The Ring of Fire
@theringoffire·1.4M subscribers·27K videos
Kellyanne Conway Claims It Is Unconstitutional To Embarrass Trump
Posted
September 16, 2019
Views
116,729
Likes
4,098
Comments
1,563
Engagement
September 16, 2019
116,729
4,098
1,563
4.85%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
You’re on September 16, 2019. Earlier episodes are to the left, later ones to the right — the row keeps loading as you go. Click any card to open it.
Sep 16, 20195:01Now PlayingGet 10% off "Impeach: The Card Slap Game"
US customers go to and use code RINGOFFIRE at checkout
NonUS customers go to and use code RINGOFFIRE at checkout
During an appearance on Fox News Sunday, Kellyanne Conway claimed that the Democrats have neither a legal nor Constitutional basis for embarrassing the President. The last time we checked, the Constitution doesn’t say anything about not embarrassing the President, but Conway doesn’t seem like she’s someone who actually understands what’s in that document. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Kellyanne Conway is many things but a legal scholar. She certainly is not. This past weekend during an appearance on Fox News, Sunway, ah, Sunday, Kellyanne Conway made the following statement about what is apparently, at least according to her in the constitution, here it is,
[tear on impeachment. What does he think about those in the house pursuing it? Complete nonsense. Even Jerry now said, oh impeachment is just a term. This is a process. They can't even, they need to get a messaging meeting and they need to read the constitution. The Democratic Party are we seeing American? The congress work for you. They work for you and they're wasting your money and their time on trying to impeach a president where there are no high crimes and misdemeanors. They thought the Mueller report would be the end all. They even had Bob Muller come and talk about the Muller important. It was a disaster. So they work for you. Tell them to vote on the US MCA, get that trade deal done. Tell them drug pricing, infrastructure, keep this great economy humming along and stop the nonsense of harassing and embarrassing this president. And the people around him when you have no constitutional or legal basis to do so.]
So I guess there you have it folks. The Democrats are kind of up a creek at this point because according to Kellyanne Conway, it is unconstitutional to embarrass the president of the United States. Uh, you can't harass him. You can't embarrass him, you can't launch investigations. Cause Kellyanne Conway says all of that is anti-constitution. Now, if Kellyanne Conway would actually take the time to read the US constitution, she would understand that we do have a system of checks and balances and that the US congress does have a responsibility to the American public to hold the president of the United States accountable when necessary. If it embarrassed him, oh well there is no a clause that says, oh, you can investigate if it's going to embarrass him. That doesn't exist. So you can carry out these investigations if it reveals horrible info. So be it kind of like with the Bill Clinton's impeachment hearing in the nineties we didn't need to know all of that, but we do. And for those of us who lived through it, unfortunately those, uh, words and images are burned into our brains and I'm willing to bet that that embarrassed President Bill Clinton, but at the same time, you didn't have brain dead Democrats coming out saying, oh, it's own constitutional to embarrass him. They talked about how ridiculous it was, sure, but never tried to claim that it was unconstitutional to be carrying out these investigations. And here's the thing, and this is what Kellyanne Conway doesn't seem to understand. The more she goes out there and says that these investigations should not exist, that it's presidential harassment or that it's unconstitutional, the more guilty it makes her boss look. So she better pray that embarrassing the president never becomes unconstitutional because she's probably going to be the first one prosecuted under that brand new amendment that may be Republicans are in fact working on, who knows, because they're all a little bit crazy these days. The Democrats have the authority to carry out
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
