October 24, 2019
8,844
419
54
5.35%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
5:38Now PlayingSign up for Top Class Actions' FREE weekly newsletter
A class action lawsuit claims that Colgate’s Optic White toothpaste does not “intrinsically whiten teeth,” as advertised. The Colgate Optic White class action lawsuit was filed by Sharon Willis who says she purchased the toothpaste because she believed it would whiten her teeth. Willis states that she used the product as directed but it did not deeply whiten her teeth or affect any intrinsic stains. The plaintiff says she relied on the marketing claims that the toothpaste would whiten her teeth and therefore didn’t receive the benefit of her purchase because she did not receive a product that performed as advertised. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this with Scott Hardy, President of Top Class Actions.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.