The President's Court Battle Over Scathing New Book Continues

Via Politicking with Larry King: The bitter court battle over a book by Trump's niece Mary continues. Larry King is joined by Mike Papantonio to talk about the headline grabbing legal drama.

Become a member today!

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!

Find our merchandise at Teespring

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel

Be sociable! Follow us on:

Follow more of our stories at

Subscribe to our podcast

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

The bitter court battle over a book by Donald Trump's niece Mary continues. Earlier I spoke with Mike Papantonio, a long time trial attorney and host of America's Lawyer with Mike Papantonio, about this headline grabbing legal drama. Here's that interview. Will they ever stop publication, Mike?

There are a lot of questions swirling around about the release of Trump's, Mary Trump's book, and they all are going to depend on what's actually in the, the nondisclosure agreement that she signed 20 years ago. Mary's lawyers are arguing that the NDA is too broad in scope and, and it's, it can't be enforced because of that. This is an actually, it's actually an argument that's made by other people who have been bound by NDAs regarding Donald Trump and those cases were very successful. Her lawyers are claiming that the Trump children lied about their assets in order to secure the estate settlement.

And if they entered into an agreement on false pretenses, then the whole thing would be considered null and void. An interesting part about this, there may be what we call, and this is a guess, but there may be what we call liquidated damages involved in this. And what that means is there hasn't, there doesn't have to be a showing of damages. There simply has to be a showing that the contract has been violated and then that, that liquidated damage amount falls on, on Mary Trump. Most of the time, you'll see a publishing company like Simon and Schuster say, look, we will handle liquidated damages. We think we can make enough money on this book that we're going to go forward anyway. And any damages that ensue from there, we'll go ahead and handle that. Daniel Ellsberg is a great example. The Daniel Ellsberg case with the Pentagon papers.

Understand those papers they were, they were published and Daniel Ellsberg was, you know, he was indicted and in the end he was not prosecuted. So the point is this, Mary Trump is at risk, Simon and Schuster is not at risk, just like in the, in Daniel Ellsberg case. Ellsberg was at risk, but the publisher was not at risk because they argued first amendment and they also argued that this notion of prior restraint on publishing or pre-publication injunction should not be considered by the court and they were successful. So I think the book comes out and I think what Mary Trump is going to have to understand is there's ramifications that are going to flow after that.

Alright. It's rare that a book is stopped from publication, isn't it?

It's very rare. It's a, it's a very fundamental first amendment, right. The court looks at yeah, there may be some issues, but the, the, the first issue we're going to look at is are we, are we willing to enjoin a publication, especially a pre-publication and this judge has said, look, there are already thousands of these books out there. What good is it going to do anyway? I think Simon and Schuster's in good shape. I can't say that Mary Trump is in good shape because we haven't had a chance to look at what that NDA is or whether there's liquidated damages in that NDA.

So at this point, it's impossible to say who's going to win on this?

Well, I think, I think Simon and Schuster is going to win. I think the book is going to be a best seller. I think it's going to generate a lot of money. And the only question is who wins between the Trump family and Mary Trump? As I said, Mary Trump is saying, look, the reason this thing is null and void, the reason the NDA is null and void is because there was fraud in the disclosure of assets that the Trump family came forward with. And so that's going to be an element they're going to argue.

#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews