March 23, 2022
232,830
12,845
1,692
6.24%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:24Now PlayingDonald Trump's attorneys went to court this week to make an emergency filing to prevent Donald and his kids from being deposed as part of the ongoing investigation in New York. Their argument shows their desperation, as the lawyers are claiming that the previous judge - the one who ordered the depositions - didn't take their argument about Letitia James' "bias" into account, but the judge DID do that and didn't find it had any merit. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains why this move is destined to fail.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Find our merchandise at Teespring
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Donald Trump is desperately trying to prevent himself and his children from having to go and testify, sit for depositions, in New York as part of the ongoing investigation by state attorney general Letitia James. So this week he sent his lawyers to court to appeal last month's ruling that said they all had to sit for their depositions and the legal reasoning for this appeal, according to Donald Trump's lawyers, is one that is likely going to get laughed out of court. Because according to the filing, the challenge, the official court challenge that his lawyers filed, they believe that the judge who made the February 17th ruling didn't actually weigh their arguments because he, at one point they said, he didn't have all of the information necessary to make a proper ruling. Well, well, gee, whose fault would that be?
I mean, if you think the judge doesn't have all of the information, maybe you should have given him all the information, but you actually did. And what information is that you ask? Well, it's the information that says that Letitia James has obviously been conducting a political witch hunt into Donald Trump and that's why this whole thing is happening and that judge back in February didn't even sit to consider that, except he did. He just didn't care. It wasn't relevant and you couldn't prove it. That's why he issued the ruling that he did. You can't file a challenge saying the judge didn't do the things that the judge already did and expect to be successful because what's going to happen is they're gonna go through the previous ruling. They're gonna go through what transpired in court, what documents the judge did in fact have and when they see that, oh, wait, everything you're saying is a lie, your case is going to get thrown out. But they know that.
See, even if they're right and the judge didn't take the time to look at all their claims of political, you know, motivations here, it would be irrelevant. It would be 100% completely irrelevant and would not invalidate this ongoing investigation. That's what these lawyers don't want the public to understand. Even if Letitia James came out right now and said, hell yeah, I'm going after him because I just hate him politically, that wouldn't change the fact that they have actually already found criminal activity and that they have evidence to continue their investigation. Now it may seem unethical to you, but that wouldn't change the facts of the criminal investigation or the civil investigation. So the judge didn't even have to consider the arguments put forward by Trump's lawyers because they were completely irrelevant. It would be like going in there and saying, judge, you can't, they can't go sit for a deposition because attorney general James likes to wear red shirts.
Okay. Even if it's true, what does that matter? That has no relevance to the case that we're talking about. We have evidence that suggests potential criminal wrongdoing on behalf of your clients. They need to go sit for depositions. But like I said, the lawyers know that this is going to fail. They're doing it to buy more time. This is obviously a very serious, you know, thing happening now. They've gotta be able to prep Donald. They gotta prep Don Jr. They gotta prep Ivanka. They gotta prep that little idiot, Eric. And it's going to take longer.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.