April 19, 2022
109,333
7,975
676
7.91%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:16Now PlayingA defamation lawsuit filed by Devin Nunes against CNN has been thrown out of another court because Nunes failed to go through the proper remedy channels in order to have his issue dealt with. This is EXACTLY what the lower court had told him to do, but Nunes was so hellbent on getting even with CNN (he was suing for more than $400 million) that he didn't want to do what was legally required of him. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins talks about this ridiculous lawsuit from Nunes.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Find our merchandise at Teespring
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Devin Nunes has once again, been laughed out of court by a panel of judges over a defamation lawsuit that he filed actually several years ago against CNN. Devin Nunes was seeking $435 million from CNN because he claims they intentionally ran a false report that they knew was false about him trying to help dig up dirt on Hunter Biden, to hurt then candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 election. And the information by the way that CNN used to, you know, make this report came directly from Lev Parnas, who I'm sure we all remember as the associate of Rudy Giuliani, who's about to be heading to jail pretty soon. So, okay. Dubious source there. Although Lev Parnas has of course been cooperating. So CNN took what Parnas had said, reported it because that's actually what they're supposed to do and Devin Nunes says, oh, I didn't do any of this. So I am suing you for $435 million. God, at this point, I don't even know if CNN has $435 million.
Last year, over a year ago, the first judge threw the case out. And then it went in front of a three judge panel in New York and in a two to one decision, because one judge said, no, no, no, his lawsuit can go forward. But the majority said, no, this can't happen. You know why Devin? Because you didn't follow the rules. You're from California, right? Therefore you needed to file this state, lawsuit, excuse me, in the state of California. And in the state of California, before you file a defamation lawsuit, there is a series of procedures that you have to go through and if you have not gone through those procedures, you cannot file a defamation lawsuit. And do you know what the very first thing is that Devin Nunes was supposed to do under California law, where he lived at the time? He was supposed to request a retraction and a correction, but he didn't do that. And see actually that's a law, by the way, that's actually very common throughout the United States, state by state it is different, but a lot of states have that.
You can't just file a defamation suit off the top. First in most states you have to request a retraction and correction. If then you do not get the retraction and correction, then there's a couple other hurdles. But basically you get to sue for defamation at that point, if of course, you can prove that it was false, what they said. Because in a defamation slander or liable lawsuit, the burden of proof is on the person filing the suit. The outlet doesn't have to prove anything. All you have to do as the plaintiff is prove that they're lying and if you can't prove they're lying, you cannot win your case. But Devin Nunes didn't even bother to ask CNN for a retraction. Didn't even tell them, hey, this didn't happen. You need to correct it. Nope. Just said, all right, now I'm. Give me $435 million. And all the judges, except for of course the one who dissented have said, yeah, Devin, you screwed up. You did not do this right. This, the direct quote is, you undisputably failed to comply with the statute. Undisputably failed. I've never seen a more accurate description of Devin Nunes in my life. He is an undisputable failure and now we have a legal ruling that kind of confirms that.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.