July 14, 2023
121,238
10,286
886
9.21%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:01Now PlayingThe Georgia state election board has filed a motion in court, asking a judge to force the conservative group "True The Vote" to turn over the so-called "evidence" that they compiled for the film "2000 Mules." If the evidence proves what the group says that it proves, there shouldn't be any reason why they wouldn't want to turn it over - unless it was either obtained illegally or was just completely made up or misrepresented. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
The conservative group, true the vote, which provided most of the, uh, evidence for the documentary film, 2000 Mules from Dinesh De Soza. Um, they have now been sued by the state of Georgia's state election board for refusing to turn over all of this so-called evidence that they had of all of this massive voter fraud that allegedly took place in the state of Georgia. So here's what happened. Based on the evidence that true the vote had gathered, the state of Georgia last year, 2022 said, we're launching an investigation. We're gonna look at all of this stuff because true the vote is totally reputable. We believe everything they say. And, and they weren't being sarcastic when they basically said these things either. Um. So they said, now all we need, by the way, true the vote is, uh, just give us the evidence that you have and, and we'll build off that, launch our investigation, get to the bottom of it.
So thanks. Could you hand it over? And again, this was early 2022. And true the vote said no, actually, no. Um, you can't have it, you know, because we, we've got a lot of people that we talk to that only talk to us on the condition of anonymity because they are the ones who actually did some of the fraud. And, you know, if, if we tell you who they are, you know, then they might, they might get arrested and the state said, yeah, but, but you talk to people that according to you, broke the law to steal the election. Um, don't you think that we need that for our investigation? If, if what you're saying is true, and so back and forth months and months, over the course of a year, true, the vote continued to say, nah, we just, oh man, our evidence is so awesome, but we just can't give it to you.
And finally, the state of Georgia had had enough and they said, screw it. We had already subpoenaed this information. You cannot hide it from us. If it does in fact contain criminal activity, you are now required to give it to us. That is what the state is arguing in court now, forcing truth, uh, true the vote to basically put up or shut up. But here's the thing, if what true the vote has said did in fact happen, wouldn't you want to expose? Like, isn't that your, your whole goal is to expose fraud, and then you claim that you exposed fraud, but now the people who could actually do something about it, you're like, ah, you can't, you can't have our evidence. That makes no sense. So that leads me to believe based on their behavior, that it's all because it's most likely all.
If they had the evidence that they claimed to have, they'd put it up. If they believed that anyone they had talked to had in fact stolen the 2020 election, they would immediately go running to the authorities with that information condition of anonymity or not. That ain't how it works, folks. If this group had something, they would've given it to the investigators over a year ago when they initially asked for it. They didn't. And that is why they're now being sued or at least have this motion filed in, uh, court in Georgia for them to turn over the info. And if they really thought they had what they claimed to have, they'd turned this information over a year ago.
Thanks for watching everyone, and well, here comes the awkward part at the end of the video where I ask you to like, comment, and share and subscribe for more content from Ring of Fire. Also, you should consider becoming a member for some exclusive content.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.