The Ring of Fire
@theringoffire·1.4M subscribers·27K videos
DOJ Allows Boeing To Repeat Failures & Microplastics Discovered In Reproductive Organs
Posted
June 5, 2024
Views
5,084
Likes
507
Comments
22
Engagement
June 5, 2024
5,084
507
22
10.41%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
8:24Now PlayingThe Department of Justice says that Boeing has violated a non-prosecution deal that they gave them years ago because the company has refused to make changes to help save lives. Plus, a new study has found that micro plastics are so prevalent in the body that 100% of the men who were tested had the cancer-causing plastics present in their reproductive organs. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.
Order a copy of Mike Papantonio's new book at
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
The Department of Justice says that Boeing has violated a non-prosecution deal that they gave them years ago because the company had refused to make any changes to help save lives. I've got Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins with me now to talk about this. And honestly, I say this all the time, you are without a doubt, one of the best progressive commentators in this business. I watch your stuff all the time. It's just, you nail it. And what's interesting to me is you nailed this story before it ever developed. Tell, let's talk about his story.
Yeah. So about five years ago is when Boeing started to see all of these problems with the 737 max. You had two massive disasters that led to more than almost 400 people dying and it's because Boeing had changed out a small part in the plane in the operating system. But they didn't tell anybody. They didn't tell the regulators like they're supposed to. They didn't even tell the pilots of the planes that, hey, we've kind of changed the electronics inside. Best of luck. So the planes crash. The DOJ looks into it and they say, well, we don't want to prosecute you. Give us two and a half billion dollars. We won't prosecute you, but you gotta change things. And Boeing said, oh, of course we're gonna change things. And then here, five years later, they didn't do anything.
They never do. I can't tell you the number of times with pharmaceutical companies, with Wall Street, with polluters that I have seen the same thing play itself out. We're not going to really throw anybody in jail. We're just gonna fine you now. Best example is the washing money for terrorists, HSBC washed a hundred billion dollars worth of money. They got fined $1.6 billion, and then they got one of these non-prosecution agreements. They're meaningless. All it is, is the government trying to protect themselves. In this situation, I promise you, you had doors flying off, entire door segments flying off. You had wheels flying off. You had, they couldn't even figure out why there were engine fires. You had the door plug where somebody is sitting completely coming off the airplane. And everybody looks at it and says, well, gee, maybe this is just a bad run of luck. No, it's not. It's Boeing trying to save money by having their subcontractors cut prices, cut costs, that type of thing. And they were under this agreement with the government, don't do that anymore. We won't throw anybody in jail. We won't prosecute you criminally. It doesn't mean anything when it comes from the Department of Justice.
Right.
They're not gonna do anything to this company. I promise you they're not. This is a company that makes missiles. You know, they're in the war business. So they're just gonna walk away from this and say, yeah, everything's fine, right?
Yeah. The DOJ says, well, we're gonna have a meeting the last day of May, and we're gonna sit and talk about this and figure out what best to do now. The thing they're gonna decide, like they always do, like they did originally is, we'll fine 'em more money because we don't want to go through the process of prosecuting them and years and years of this. Because if we lose, then we look bad. Oh, that could hurt my career when I leave the DOJ. I don't want to prosecute a company I may have to represent in court five years from now. So we'll fine you. We're just gonna pretend none of this happened.
But okay. You hit on something real important there. You hit on the fact that we have to look at who the lawyers are who make these decisions. Right?
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
