Judge Smacks Down Trump's $15 Billion New York Times Lawsuit
September 20, 2025
10,168
900
58
9.42%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Ring of Fire Episodes Around September 20, 2025
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:58Now PlayingJudge Smacks Down Trump's $15 Billion New York Times Lawsuit
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelA federal judge issued a damning rebuke of Donald Trump's lawsuit against the New York Times. The four page order describes in detail the requirements and purpose of a complaint, the mechanism which creates a lawsuit, and goes on to state unequivocally, the complaint is decidedly improper and impermissible. The order strikes the complaint, meaning it's gone and gives Trump's attorneys 28 days to file a different one, else the lawsuit be concluded.
Subscribe to stay connected to our stories
Support us by becoming a member on YouTube
Or Support us on Patreon
Buy Ring of Fire merch
Find us on social media!
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
A federal judge issued a damning rebuke of Donald Trump's lawsuit against the New York Times. The four page order describes in detail the requirements and purpose of a complaint, the mechanism which creates a lawsuit, writing, in this action, a prominent American citizen, perhaps the most prominent American citizen, alleges defamation by a prominent American newspaper publisher, perhaps the most prominent American newspaper publisher, and by several other corporate and natural persons. It goes on to state unequivocally, the complaint is decidedly improper and impermissible. The judge writes, a complaint remains an improper and impermissible place for tedious and burdensome aggregation of perspective evidence for the rehearsal of tendentious argument, or for the protracted recitation and explanation of legal authority putatively supporting the pleaders claim for relief.
As a lawyer knows or is presumed to know, a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective, not a protected platform to rage against an adversary. A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers corner. The order strikes the complaint, meaning it's gone and gives Trump's attorneys 28 days to file a different one, else the lawsuit be concluded. When so many institutions and people entrusted with upholding the law equally, for all of us have failed, it is refreshing to see an honest application by this judge. Thank you for doing your job.
Thanks for watching everybody. And if you are not already, please subscribe to the channel. We got fresh content every day for you. And if you want to follow us across social media, make sure you check out all of the social links that we have posted in the description of this video.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









