June 28, 2019
984
45
11
5.69%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
6:02
23:25Now PlayingPolitical maps, such as those that send people to Congress, are in the control of the political branches. The Constitution requires that these maps are contiguous and of equal population. Of course, there are a lot of ways to draw lines that meet those limits ...
Both North Carolina and Maryland maps were challenged, one argued as favoring Republicans, and the other favoring Democrats. The evidence for bias based on statistics was compelling, but can the Supreme Court start overturning political maps based on political consideration without being perceived as just another political branch themselves?
The Supreme Court has been on search for a standard for years, even decades. Did they finally find one? Is there any remedy here? Can a court hear this kind of case at all?
A decision of extreme political consequence is our topic for today!
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.