Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos
Denied firearm for life for old mental illness
Posted
April 7, 2020
Views
11,100
Likes
244
Comments
133
Engagement
3.40%
April 7, 2020
11,100
244
133
3.40%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
13:31Now PlayingFederal law prohibits any person who has been "adjudicated as mentally defective" from purchasing, owning, or possessing a firearm. Sounds reasonable in the abstract. But then we consider this plaintiff.
20 years ago, he was sent to a mental hospital. Since then, he has earned a GED, a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, and has gotten married and had children. The state of Washington granted him relief under state law relating to the firearm prohibition, but the federal law is still a barrier.
In today's legal analysis, we discuss the second amendment right as it relates to this plaintiff, and we discuss whether being barred for life is just in this as-applied challenge.
----
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitter
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf)
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
