Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos
Don't have to take down THAT cross
Posted
May 1, 2020
Views
1,195
Likes
88
Comments
23
Engagement
9.29%
May 1, 2020
1,195
88
23
9.29%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
24:49Now PlayingThe cross is a symbol meaning many things to many people, and also have obvious religious meaning. Sometimes, these crosses appear on government land and are maintained at government expense.
Does that violated the first amendment? The Supreme Court has said no if the cross has been there long enough.
In today's legal analysis, we see a court reverse itself because of the Supreme Court decision, and discuss whether a particular cross can stay or if it needs to go.
----
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitter
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf)
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
