Washington Post
Washington Post
@washingtonpost·2.8M subscribers·24.4K videos

I read the White House’s Smithsonian report so you don’t have to

Posted

July 11, 2026

Views

13,154

Likes

1,070

Comments

60

Engagement

8.59%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

A new White House report tries to demonstrate how “ideological capture” at the National Museum of American History “Erases Our Heritage.” And at every turn, it proves the opposite, while scrubbing American history of everything that doesn’t fit officials’ feel-good narrative of a country only incidentally marred by imperfections, all of which are safely in our past.

The report often doesn’t even bother to engage with many of the claims it ridicules or takes them as self-evident proof that the Smithsonian is misrepresenting history.

Just follow the footnotes, and you quickly realize this is a relentlessly tendentious piece of trash, culture critic Philip Kennicott says.

Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube

Guests & Subjects Covered

White HouseNational MuseumPhilip KennicottThe Washington PostYouTube Follow

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

I read the White House’s Smithsonian report so you don’t have to · Washington Post · Sentinel