May 29, 2019
11,076
1,689
274
17.72%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
9:34Now PlayingThe Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld part of an Indiana law requiring aborted infants to be cremated or buried after an abortion. However, they sidestepped a larger ruling on abortion by deciding not to weigh in on whether a child can be aborted for their race, sex, or disability.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, in which he addressed the pro-abortion movement’s well-known history with eugenics, and how the Court’s decision not to rule on the Indiana statute leaves an open question on whether eugenic abortions are protected by the Constitution.
(ARTICLE: THE FEDERALIST)
*SOCIAL MEDIA*
✅ Wooden Flags
–––––––––––––––––––––––
👕 Order your shirts here
📲 Tip me though PayPal
📲 Sponsor me on Patreon
🌐 Visit my website
💬 Connect with us on Discord
–––––––––––––––––––––––
SCOTUS CLARENCE THOMAS WRITTEN OPINION ON ABORTION AND EUGENICS:
Justice Clarence Thomas Blasts Abortion As A Tool Of Racist Eugenicists
Clarence Thomas: Abortion A Potential “Tool Of Eugenics” Supreme Court Will Need To Address Soon
Why Clarence Thomas wrote over a dozen pages on eugenics
Justice Clarence Thomas Likens Some Abortions to Eugenics in 20-Page Supreme Court Opinion
Supreme Court leaves intact block on Indiana abortion restriction, but allows fetal burial to go into effect
Supreme Court allows Indiana to require burial of fetal remains, but not ban certain abortions
Supreme Court Upholds Controversial Indiana Abortion Law
16,433 aborted babies in a dumpster
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.