November 21, 2023
115,434
10,068
693
9.32%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:36Now PlayingState-level, and sometimes even local-level, Republican parties have been letting the MAGA loyalists take over in recent years, and the results have been absolutely disastrous for the Party. As it turns out, both donors and voters don't like the extreme right turn of the Party, as they are now flirting with full-blown authoritarianism, and it is costing them votes and money with a major election now less than 12 months away. Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Listen to our videos in an audio format by subscribing to our podcast
Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!
Connect with Farron on Twitter
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
Special prosecutor Jack Smith is still trying to get the judge, judge Tanya Chut, to not allow cameras in the courtroom for Donald Trump's trial, for his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. And Smith has been very clear about his reasoning for not wanting the cameras in there. He has basically said, listen, camera's in there. Donald Trump is gonna turn this into a circus, right? It's going to be exactly what Trump wants it to be, which would be the Trump show. And it puts a giant target on every single witness that comes into this courtroom. And with the witnesses knowing that information, it could make them less li less likely to testify. So he's worried that cameras in the courtroom are going to result in a, uh, you know, witness intimidation type thing. But that brings me to a question from one of our viewers, uh, viewer.
Nothing better to do. 70 asked. I would like for you to speak about Trump's DC trial being televised or not being televised. Trump is going to try to play it every different way. Now, here's the thing about Jack Smith's request, and this, you know, goes to that question. If Smith is successful and prevents the trial from being televised, you have just handed Donald Trump the best ammunition that that man has ever had in his life, because he will go out there every single day claiming that the trial is rigged, knowing that we're not in there to see it, you know? So he'll make up these fantasies about what's happening in court, claim that he is the victim, all this persecution, I mean, they're doing it in New York right now. That's how we know it's what he'll do. And his base will believe it and he'll say, I wanted the whole thing to be out in the open.
I told the judge to put it on tv, but Jack Smith wanted it hidden because he's up to no good. Trump will say that. And unfortunately, millions of people in this country will believe it. That is assuming of course, that Smith is successful in not getting the trial televised. I personally happen to think that this trial should in fact be televised a hundred percent. Like without a doubt, without hesitation, this thing should be televised. And I understand the risks that come along with that for the potential witnesses, but televised or not, those witnesses are going to be just as attacked by Trump's followers. You know, no matter what, put 'em on tv, they'll be attacked. Don't put 'em on tv, and reporters will report on what they said that day in that evening's news, and they'll still be attacked. Like there's literally no way to stop that. It doesn't matter TV or not. So I, I, I am sorry in this particular instance, I don't follow Jack Smith's line of reasoning. Okay? Trump's gonna attack these people, maybe not with the gag order, but his followers will, his allies
Will. So again, you may as well put the whole thing on TV so that there is the transparency and it's pretty easy to allow this to not become the Donald Trump show. What we have in this trial, the evidence that we already know exists, which is just, you know, the tip of the iceberg on what is actually going to be presented is vital to the American public. Like we deserve to know these things. The man, basically, according to the charges, committed fraud against the government, the government's funded with our tax dollars we're all affected by this. Let us see what's happening, and I think that's what should happen. I do not think there are great, uh, risks to the witnesses being on TV or being not on tv. The risks I think, are gonna remain the same, uh, either way. So at least give us the transparency. Don't allow Donald Trump to capture the narrative and spin it every evening on truth social. That's not gonna help anybody. If we can see what's happening, we can see through his BS and everybody benefits from that.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.