Jeffrey Goldberg
@WashingtonWeekPBS·209K subscribers·2.6K videos
Will 2016 race be the most negative in history?
Posted
August 22, 2015
Views
950
Likes
14
Comments
1
Engagement
1.58%
August 22, 2015
950
14
1
1.58%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
8:30Now PlayingWith 22 candidates running for the presidency and billions of dollars set to be spent on campaign ads, the 2016 race for the White House is shaping up to be the most negative in history. Morning Consult's Reid Wilson says that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are still on track to be their party's nominees, but they are both facing hard opinions from voters. The Washington Post's Ed O'Keefe says to expect biographical ads from the Bush campaign by the end of the year hoping to reintroduce him to voters. Their message? You may know the Bush name, but you don't know Jeb. As for Clinton, The Atlantic's Molly Ball says that the candidate is "terribly choreographed," but she is trying to loosen up voters' opinions.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
