Prof Sam Vaknin
@samvaknin·443K subscribers·2.3K videos
Your Senses, Your Emotions, Your Morality (3rd Intl. Conference on Addiction and Psychiatry)
Posted
September 2, 2020
Views
15,089
Likes
489
Comments
5
Engagement
September 2, 2020
15,089
489
5
3.27%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:00:46Now PlayingKeynote Presentation to the 3rd Intl. Conference on Addiction and Psychiatry, September 2020
Big part of the text here
The proto-psychologists James and Lange have (separately) proposed that emotions are the experiencing of physical responses to external stimuli.
They are mental representations of totally corporeal reactions. Sadness is what we call the feeling of crying. This was phenomenological materialism at its worst.
To have full-blown emotions (not merely detached observations), one needed to experience palpable bodily symptoms.
The James-Lange Theory apparently did not believe that a quadriplegic can have emotions, since he definitely experiences no bodily sensations.
Sensationalism, another form of fanatic empiricism, stated that all our knowledge derived from sensations or sense data. There is no clear answer to the question how do these sensa (=sense data) get coupled with interpretations or judgements. Kant postulated the existence of a "manifold of sense" – the data supplied to the mind through sensation.
In the "Critique of Pure Reason" he claimed that these data were presented to the mind in accordance with its already preconceived forms (sensibilities, like space and time). But to experience means to unify these data, to cohere them somehow. Even Kant admitted that this is brought about by the synthetic activity of "imagination", as guided by "understanding". Not only was this a deviation from materialism (what material is "imagination" made of?) – it was also not very instructive.
The problem was partly a problem of communication. Emotions are qualia, qualities as they appear to our consciousness. In many respects they are like sense data (which brought about the aforementioned confusion).
But, as opposed to sensa, which are particular, qualia are universal. They are subjective qualities of our conscious experience.
It is impossible to ascertain or to analyze the subjective components of phenomena in physical, objective terms, communicable and understandable by all rational individuals, independent of their sensory equipment. The subjective dimension is comprehensible only to conscious beings of a certain type (=with the right sensory faculties).
Buy most of my books in Amazon
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
