September 20, 2022
1,078,270
78,314
1,325
7.39%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
0:59Now PlayingWatch all of my long form videos:
Connect with me on Twitter:
@ryanmcbeth
I don’t have a Patreon account. If you want to give me money, give it to:
HelpIsOnTheWayUA.com
Or
WCK.com
Join the conversation:
Want to send me something?
Ryan McBeth Productions LLC
8705 Colesville Rd.
Suite 249
Silver Spring, MD 20910
USA
There four reasons why Ukraine didn't do this:
#1. Explosives are normally only handled by combat engineers or "Sappers." Most units don't have a lot of engineers and they would be very busy setting every bridge to explode.
#2. Explosives can change chemically when exposed to heat, light, and moisture. So you can't just leave explosives on a bridge for a few months and hope they are OK when the time is needed.
#3. Explosives are expensive. There is a very real risk of people steaking the explosives or the wiring components.
#4. This means that if you set up explosives, you must guard these sites. This pulls more troops away from the front lines.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.