August 14, 2021
15,830
1,141
145
8.12%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
5:34
4:38Now PlayingVia America’s Lawyer: President Biden orders the CDC to impose another eviction moratorium to protect millions of renters from homelessness. RT correspondent Brigida Santos joins Mike Papantonio to explain how real estate moguls have been aggressively lobbying against the order – insisting they’re losing out on profits.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Find our merchandise at Teespring
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
President Joe Biden has ordered the CDC to issue a new federal eviction moratorium to temporarily halt evictions in counties where COVID-19 is spreading rapidly. Brigida Santos joins me to talk about this story. Wow, this is, this is complicated, isn't it? How likely are the courts to uphold the CDC's latest order? What's your take on that?
I think it's pretty unlikely at this point. This week, a federal judge in Washington already hinted that the 60 day eviction freeze won't survive legal challenges by landlords because some justices on the Supreme Court have already previously stated that the centers for disease control and prevention did not have the authority to issue an eviction ban in the first place after the one imposed by Congress expired. Now, the reason SCOTUS initially declined to lift the ban is because the landlord group asked the high court to do so just days before the first CDC moratorium was set to expire. But now that a new order has been implemented by the CDC legal challenges are likely to overturn that eviction freeze. SCOTUS has already said that Congress is the only one that has the authority to temporarily prevent landlords from kicking out tenants. So until Congress steps in, the latest order is very likely to be struck down.
Yeah, it was symbolic by Biden. There's, there's no way the courts are going to say, yeah, you can do this. Most of the issues surrounding CDC, surrounding the COVID issues are all, they fall into what we call police powers, health, safety and welfare. I don't know that this gets it there. It's a taking of property. The landowner obviously has, some of these landowners are claiming they're going bankrupt. The ugly part of it is because Wall Street, who has no risk of on bankrupt, they're just saying, you know, we want our money, hell with everybody else, which is typical of Wall Street. How's Wall Street trying to cash in on these evictions?
Yeah. The Intercept reports that Wall Street analysts are asking corporate apartment owners, how they can benefit from future evictions. Investor owned apartment trusts are now reportedly gearing up to remove tenants for nonpayment, renovate units and then hike up rent costs. Real estate groups have also focused on how to generate profits during the pandemic and they spent over $100 million lobbying. Prices in the housing market shot up during the pandemic and rent prices are now following suit. In June, rent was up 14% from the previous year. Real estate stocks have also soared, but for tenants facing eviction, renting again in the future is going to be very difficult once you have an eviction on your record.
Yeah, you can't look at this just as a Wall Street issue. They're always flying monkey predators coming out of Wall Street. They're the ugliest of the uglies. But on the other side of that, you've got mom and pop, okay. They, they, they have an investment in something that they're renting out. They run the risk of going bankrupt if that money doesn't come in. So it's a really complicated situation. I think the court is going to look at it and they're going to look at the mom and pop side of it and say, no, you have no right to take this unnecessarily. Congress created an emergency rental assistance program to help tenants during the pandemic. What's the status of that? That seems like it's a more logical approach.
It's more logical, but unfortunately states are making it incredibly hard for renters to access the $46 billion emergency rental assistance fund and on top of that, places like California have been struggling to pay people.
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.