Pentagon Is Spying On People Who "Hurt Generals' Feelings"

A new report from The Intercept has revealed that the Pentagon is scrolling through social media trying to identify people making mean tweets about military generals. They claim they’re doing this for safety reasons, but they’re actually trying to keep tabs on anyone that is critical of the US war machine. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.

Check out our merch by visiting our store

Subscribe to our podcast

Become a member today!

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel

Be sociable! Follow us on:

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

A new report from The Intercept has revealed that the Pentagon is scrolling through social media, trying to identify people making mean tweets, mean tweets about military generals. They claim they're doing this for the safety of the country, but they're actually trying to keep tabs on anyone that's critical. I mean, literally critical of the US war machine. That's what this is about. We were attacked on this. Do you remember? What, Suzanne Spaulding, remember?

Yeah.

Whatever that hinky organization she was with that was, they were, you know, US Chamber of Commerce, they were associated industry. They attacked us, me in particular, about how I was ruining democracy by being critical of judges, I guess the military and the military complex. You go figure. But this is a crazy story.

It really is. And again, gotta hand it to The Intercept. They do such a good job with these kinds of stories. So what they've uncovered is the fact that the Pentagon under the guise of keeping our generals safe is going through people's social media. They're looking at, oh, okay, this person said something bad about this general, so we gotta beef up security for this general. And they swear to us they're only using publicly available information and that, as The Intercept points out, is a misleading term because publicly available information means also what they're selling to corporations. Your data, your browsing history, the places you visited, locations, all of that, that isn't actually publicly available, but it is if you've got the money to buy it.

Yeah. Okay. So let's get down to the brass tax. The brass tax is, this is so we can avoid having somebody embarrass or humiliate a general, a sitting general or an ex general along with causing injury or kidnap. I get all that. I mean, you know, that makes perfect sense. But when you start saying you become a target, if you embarrass or humiliate that ex general or sitting general, or if you express opinions that are, these are the words, express opinions that are critical of that general and maybe what he did to flame up a war that shouldn't have taken place. You name it. But, you know, go ahead and pick up with the secretary Betsy DeVos. You've got Mark Pruitt. You've had agencies that also are looking for the same protection, right?

Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, DeVos was tens of millions of dollars spent on her protection based on people being mean to her online.

Literally being mean to her online. That's the operative word.

Yeah. Not threatening her, not saying, Betsy.

$24 million.

Right. They weren't saying, Betsy, I know where you live. I'll see you tonight. They said, wow, she's really bad at education. But to me, what we see is we see so many people, we see it on the right, we see it on the left. They're worried about social media is gonna censor us. They're coming after the left, they're coming after the right. No, the people who are actually working on censoring and monitoring your data that's coming from the Pentagon itself here. And we are being divided into the left and right on this issue to distract from the fact that they are the ones, the government itself is the ones coming after us. And they have been for years. They just continuously evolve in their monitoring methods and the latest is social media.

Okay, let me hear, I love word salad, you know, when it comes from a governmental entity. They base this on a term, we don't want misattribution, misattribution to take place where you're mean to a general, you're mean to a government entity, somebody running the EPA or whatever to where you're mean to them.