January 28, 2024
310,799
21,697
2,146
7.67%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
3:49Now PlayingThe divorce filings for the prosecutor that is allegedly having an affair with Fani Willis were unsealed this week, and it created a giant hole in the scandal. The divorce proceedings - hundreds of pages long - don't actually mention Willis at all, which is a major blow to the Republicans that are trying to use this as an excuse to get the charges against Trump and others dropped. Willis isn't in the clear yet, but she's looking better already, as Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains.
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
There was a very interesting development in the NY Willis scandal this week, and it involved the unsealing of the divorce proceedings from the prosecutor that is on Willis' team that she allegedly was having an affair with. And the funniest part is that the unsealing of these divorce papers was actually requested by one of the co-defendants in Georgia, a man by the name of Michael Roman. Roman is the one who filed the complaint initially that says that Fannie Willis is having an affair with his guy and went on vacations with 'em using state money and we demand an investigation and we may even call for a mistrial dismissal of charges, all of that. And so the judge this week finally said, okay, you want the divorce proceedings unsealed? I'll unseal these divorce proceedings so that you can use them for your, for your case here that you're filed. And unfortunately for Mr. Roman, those divorce proceedings, those papers, hundreds of pages by the way, do not contain one single mention of the name FA Willis. They do mention other people that Mr. Wade, the prosecutor may have had extramarital affairs with. So based on these documents, it does appear that Mr. Wade, according to at least his ex-wife, has, you know, not exactly been faithful, but in all those charges of uh, uh, um, what was it, unfaithfulness?
No, Fannie Willis. Huh, interesting. Right. But here's what's even more interesting. Fannie Willis wasn't even actually brought into this whole thing until Mr. Roman's complaint. It was after Mr. Roman's complaint that Willis was then subpoenaed to come and, and testify for the divorce proceedings. So all of this could be totally bogus. I know a couple days ago things were looking pretty bad, you know, it was looking like, oh God, Fannie Willis may have done these things. Because yeah, there are trips, the trips that Roman and Marjorie Taylor Greene, by the way, alleged that Fannie Willis took with Mr. Wade showed up on Mr. Wade's credit cards. But we don't actually have the evidence, at least right now, that Fannie Willis was the person who went with him on those trips. And also they clearly were not paid for with state money. So that allegation that's gone and it may be gone altogether. So again, very interesting developments that blow a giant hole into the GOP's claims that Fannie Willis is having an affair with this
Prosecutor, and that somehow changes the facts of the case. It doesn't. Now, would it be improper? Sure, absolutely. I'm not gonna argue with you on that. Does it affect the facts of the case? Does it affect what the grand jury decided? Not one bit. Not at all. But now it's looking that maybe the affair never even happened in the first place. Maybe this was just another concoction by the defendants to try to weasel their way out of the charges against them. And it's really starting to look like that might be the case after all.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.