March 18, 2024
202,429
15,312
999
8.06%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:30Now PlayingDonald Trump posted a completely incomprehensible rant on Truth Social following the resignation of prosecutor Nathan Wade from the Georgia prosecutorial team. Wade was forced to resign by the judge (it was either him or Fani Willis,) and Trump is acting like he just won the case. But on top of that, the former President hinted at Jack Smith being removed, and promised "BIG THINGS" are coming in the near future. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins dissects Trump's incoherent rant.
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
As we all know on Friday, judge McAfee in Georgia ruled that Fanny Willis can in fact stay on the case in Georgia. She can continue prosecuting Donald Trump. But Nathan Wade, the man with whom she was having a relationship, he's gotta go. And if you want Wade to stay, then you have to go, is what the judge said. The judge did rule by the way that there's technically nothing improper about this relationship, but it does kind of put an appearance of impropriety. So let's just get rid of that appearance and everybody's good to go. And then late Friday night, Nathan Wade said, okay, fine. I'm off the team. Thanks anyway. So it's settled, it's done. We're good to go. But after Wade resigned, Donald Trump got on truth social as he always does, and posted an absolutely incoherent message. And maybe you can make sense of it, because God knows I can't. Here is what Trump wrote on true social. The Fanny Willis lover, Mr. Nathan Wade, Esquire has just resigned in disgrace as per his and her reading of the judge's order today, Nathan was the special in more ways than one prosecutor engaged by Fanny pronounced NY Willis to persecute Trump for crooked Joe Biden in his Department of Injustice for purposes of election interference and living the life of the rich and famous. This is the equivalent of deranged Jack Smith getting canned big stuff, something which should happen in the not too distant future.
Oh boy, where do we even start with that? Right? Like living the lifestyle of the rich and famous. What does that even mean? Because that wasn't like, that's, that's not a thing. They're accused of living the lifestyle of the rich and no, they're not. Like that didn't happen. They took a $4,000 vacation. Like that's it. Honestly, if you've not taken a vacation in America recently, if you can get one for under $4,000, hell, that's a hell of a deal. Um, so yeah, that's, uh, that's, that's not lifestyles of the rich and famous, that's just typical vacation costs. Um, and he was the special, as Trump said, prosecutor, no, he, he was not a special prosecutor. He was a prosecutor, brought in on the team. There were no special prosecutors in this case. So, so far you're, oh, for two, and then this is the equivalent of Jack Smith getting kicked off. No, no, it's not. Absolutely a hundred percent not. This would be like if Jack Smith got rid of one of the lower members of his team. Fanny Willis is the Jack Smith of the Georgia case, and she ain't going anywhere. So Nathan Wade being removed really doesn't change anything, shouldn't even change the timeline of things. So, oh, for three, and then you said Jack Smith is
Likely gonna be kicked off the case in the not too distant future. That that is also not a thing. Like, that's not something that is going to happen. We know, by the way, that some of your friends, including Steven Miller and uh, uh, what was it, Reagan's, uh, uh, attorney General Meese, I believe it was, uh, they, they did file amicus briefs in the documents case saying, Hey, Jack Smith can't be special prosecutor because he, he wasn't an employee of the DOJ at the time, which is by the way, not a prerequisite to being appointed a special prosecutor, but they're trying to make that argument anyway, and it's not going to go anywhere. Jack Smith is not going to be thrown off the case
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.