U.S. at WAR w/IRAN, IRANIAN LEADER DEAD!

** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!!

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

Larry and Danny argue that whether the U.S. or Israel directly carried out recent strikes, the U.S. is responsible either directly or by facilitating them. They contend that killing Iranian leaders or civilians would not force Iran to surrender but instead harden its resolve. Citing the 1980–1988 Iran–Iraq War, they note Iran endured massive casualties—hundreds of thousands dead—without capitulating, suggesting it is unlikely to back down now.

They argue that attacks on schools and leadership targets would fuel public outrage in Iran and potentially shift retaliation toward U.S. bases in the region, complicating American military operations. The discussion raises the possibility that if Iran’s Supreme Leader were killed—despite reports denying it—his removal could eliminate opposition to nuclear weapons within Iran and accelerate a push to build a bomb, with some comparing the logic to North Korea’s deterrence strategy.

The speakers strongly criticize President Donald Trump’s justification for military action, disputing his historical claims about Iran’s role in events such as the 1979 embassy hostage crisis, the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, and the USS Cole attack. They argue the U.S. has inflicted greater casualties on Iran over decades and accuse Washington of selectively presenting history to justify war.

They also question whether the American public will accept the administration’s rationale, suggesting many are confused or skeptical. Finally, they warn that stated objectives—destroying Iran’s missile capabilities, navy, and regional proxies—may be unrealistic and risk deeper escalation, especially if U.S. casualties begin to mount.