HUGE Epstein Breakthrough: Trump SCRAMBLES As Judge Demands Answers On Epstein File Redactions!!

A federal judge has ordered Todd Blanche’s Justice Department to release unredacted Epstein-related FBI interview files involving a woman who accused Trump of sexual assault when she was 13, or explain why the records should remain hidden. Farron Cousins breaks this down.

Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!

Join our Discord

Become a member for EARLY ACCESS to videos

Get "Be Like Trump" on Amazon here

Follow me on social media!

Listen to my videos in an audio format by subscribing to my podcast

A federal judge has ordered acting attorney general Todd Blanch to deliver to the court by July 2nd a full explanation as to why you have not released all of the Epstein files, which is a very clear violation of federal law, aka the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Oh, and by the way, you're not just going to explain why you haven't released all the files. You're also going to explain why certain things are still redacted when they obviously should not be redacted. Because, by the way, another part of the Epstein Files Transparency Act says that any redactions have to be explained to Congress and they were not. Or the judge says, "You can just go ahead and release all the full unredacted files and you don't have to submit answers to my court if you just do what you're supposed to be doing. This is in response to a lawsuit brought by investigative journalist Katie Fang. And one of the specific things that was redacted that of course the judge wants answers to is the story of the 13-year-old girl, the then 13-year-old girl who says that Donald Trump attempted to force her to perform sexual acts on him and when she refused, he slapped her and got angry obviously.

But yes, the woman was, you know, a captive of Epstein essentially and he brought her into a room with Donald Trump and basically was like, "Go do what I, you know, have kidnapped you to do." Her story was so credible that in the year 2019, she spoke to the FBI on four separate occasions to give her account of what happened, not just in that incident, but other incidents over the years. But it was after she told the story about what happened with Donald Trump a few days a few days after that Epstein was no longer alive. So, you know, make of that what you will. I'm not here to push conspiracy theories, but the timing of that final FBI interview where she told a story about Donald Trump trying to force her to perform acts on him.

Then Epstein dies suddenly. Sounds a little fishy if you ask me. But again, I don't know exactly what happened. All we can do is speculate. And part of the reason all we can do is speculate is because Todd Blanch and the rest of the administration continues to keep all of these files a secret. What kills me about this story though, aside from the corruption, the abuse of power, and all of that, and the disgusting, you know, uh uh uh PDF of it, is the White House's response because Caroline Levit, and this was not in response to this new judge's ruling, by the way, the judge is US District Judge Emtt Sullivan. But in the past, Caroline Levit told the Daily Beast about this particular story involving the then 13-year-old girl. She said, quote, "The total baselessness of these accusations is also supported by the obvious fact that Joe Biden's Department of Justice knew about them for four years and did nothing with them because they knew President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong."

So Caroline Levit's justification as to why this story is totally bogus is because Biden didn't prosecute Trump for it. Like that that's your evidence. It's like, well, obviously if he did it, Biden would have prosecuted him. But he didn't, so he didn't. See, this this is what happens um when uneducated people, you know, who are too young to hold the job they hold to. They're inexperienced in life and they're inexperienced in education. Even though she does have a formal college education, she obviously didn't do great.