August 18, 2026
4,527
612
157
16.99%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
56:42Now PlayingIn a Hot Mics EXCLUSIVE, ABC News legal analyst and former homicide prosecutor and ABC Legal Analyst, Matt Murphy joins Billy for a deep dive into the Lindsay Clancy trial — and makes a major prediction about the verdict.
Murphy breaks down the prosecution's case, Kevin Reddington's defense strategy, the state's unusual legal standard for criminal responsibility, and why he believes the jury is likely to find Clancy not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children.
Murphy spent 17 years prosecuting homicide cases in the Orange County District Attorney's Office and brings a veteran prosecutor's perspective to one of the most closely watched trials in America.
At the center of the case is the question of Lindsay Clancy's mental state. The defense argues that Clancy suffered a psychotic break amid severe postpartum mental illness and extensive psychiatric treatment.
Billy and Matt also examine:
Kevin Reddington's courtroom strategy and why Murphy believes Clancy's defense attorney has delivered a masterful performance.
The prosecution's handling of the case and the challenges prosecutors face proving Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible.
Postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis, Lindsay's psychiatric treatment and the numerous medications prescribed before the deaths.
Testimony from psychiatrist Dr. Jennifer Tufts and Reddington's aggressive cross-examination of the medical professionals who treated Clancy.
The controversy surrounding Patrick Clancy, what the forensic evidence actually shows, and the online theories questioning his actions.
Why Murphy says forensic evidence undermines claims that Patrick killed the children — while acknowledging serious questions about why Lindsay was left alone with them after disclosing thoughts of harming them.
The Apple Watch, Lindsay's body temperature, DNA evidence and other details that have fueled intense social-media speculation.
When online true-crime sleuthing helps solve cases — and when internet theories can go dangerously wrong.
The evidence overwhelmingly establishes that Lindsay Clancy killed her children. The legal question for this jury is something very different — was she criminally responsible under Massachusetts law given her mental condition at the time?
Billy and Matt also turn to the Nick Reiner case, comparing California's much tougher insanity standard with the law Lindsay Clancy faces in Massachusetts. Murphy explains why he sees the two cases very differently and discusses the challenge facing defense attorney Alan Jackson.
Matt Murphy is a former Orange County homicide prosecutor, ABC News legal analyst, trial attorney and co-host with Mark Geragos of In the Well on the MK True Crime network.
Subscribe to Hot Mics with Billy Bush for continuing coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial, major criminal cases, breaking news and conversations with the people who know how the justice system really works.
#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #MattMurphy #BillyBush #HotMics #KevinReddington #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #Courtroom #LegalAnalysis #NickReiner
You can listen live exclusively on TuneIn Monday through Thursday 9am PT / 12pm ET. Ask your Alexa or Google device to "Play Hot Mics with Billy Bush on TuneIn" to listen.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.