June 9, 2026
10,141
920
48
9.55%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
0:39Now PlayingRandall Carlson's digital academy is finally here five decades of research coming together in one living university. Don't miss this.
He examines one of the most troubling aspects of the climate debate: the systematic exclusion of data that contradicted model predictions. When late twentieth century measurements failed to align with computer projections, certain researchers simply left that data out of their reconstructions. This wasn't an oversight or a minor technical decision. It was a deliberate choice to present a narrative rather than the full picture. The models driving policy recommendations required validation, and when the real-world data didn't cooperate, the data was set aside. Independent scientists couldn't replicate the work because key datasets were withheld. The issue isn't whether climate changes or even whether humans play a role. The issue is whether the scientific process itself was compromised in service of a predetermined conclusion.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.