Marco Rubio AGAIN Proves He's The Dumbest Person In The Senate

Republican Senator Marco Rubio had his debate with Democratic challenger Val Demings this week, and things did not go well for him at all. If the race was based on competency, Rubio would be polling at zero percent. He proved to us once again during the debate that he's the dumbest person sitting in the Senate today, and Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains why that is.

Check out our merch by visiting our store

Subscribe to our podcast

Become a member today!

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel

Be sociable! Follow us on:

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

Now I have been saying for quite some time now that I firmly believe that Marco Rubio is the dumbest human being, currently serving in the United States Senate. Now, if Herschel Walker wins his election, he will absolutely steal that title from Marco Rubio. But from now Rubio's got it. And he proved in this week's debate with his Democratic challenger, Val Demings, just how stupid he truly is. And its statements like this that highlight the complete lack of a brain inside Marco Rubio's head. So take a look at this weird clip where Rubio explains why ballot drop boxes are so dangerous to Americans. Here it is. That's

A method of voting that doesn't advantage one group or another. There's a danger involved in Dropboxes. People need to think about it, okay? Imagine if someone decides, Oh, there's a Dropbox, I'm just gonna put some explosive in it and blow it up and burn all of those ballots. And now those votes don't count at all. Okay? There is, there is something with elections, there are two things that are very important. Number one, the count has to be accurate. The votes have to be counted accurately. But the other is, there has to be public confidence. The public has to believe that the elections were fair.

They, they could blow up, right? Somebody could put a bomb in one. And then, then what are you gonna do? Right there? There goes your, your, your human being. He's dead there. Go all those ballots, you know, because it's, it's a Dropbox. People just throw a bomb in it. Let me ask you a question, Marco. Do you not ride in cars? Do you not, uh, uh, go to your mailbox? Do you not do anything at all other than cower on your living room floor? Because I don't know if you know this, but a bomb could go anywhere, right? I mean, it's not only ballot drop boxes that somebody could plant an explosive device in. I I, I, I don't understand anything at all you're trying to say. They're like, Well, people could, could bomb it, so we can't do it. People could bomb an office building.

They have bombed office buildings, they've bombed cars, they've put bombs on the side of the road and just blown them up. A bomb could go anywhere. That is the dumbest argument I think I've ever heard until, of course, you brought up your other point, which is people don't trust them. Okay? That, that sounds like a problem for those people. Why is everybody else being punished? Because a couple of frigging yahoos out there say, I don't trust those ballot drop boxes. Cool. Don't use them. There's, there's the solution to that. And honestly, you saying that people don't trust ballot drop boxes, so that's why we shouldn't use them, is even dumber than you saying people could put a bomb in them. Listen, conservatives don't trust a lot of things. They don't trust the, the media, They don't trust politicians. They, they don't trust environmental regulations. They don't trust climate scientists.

They don't trust doctors. They don't trust vaccines. They don't trust ballot drop boxes. Does that mean we have to ban all of those other things? Like they don't trust public education? Do we have to get rid of that? Do we have to get rid of, of doctors? Do we have to get rid of climate scientists and all scientists basically in general, just because some conservatives don't trust them? Or do we just say, Well, that's your problem. You deal with that on your own time. We're not gonna punish the entirety of the United States population because a couple of morons think they know better because they've been duped by idiot conservatives like Marco Rubio, because that's really what's at the heart of this, isn't it, Marco?