Study Links Eating Freshwater Fish To Toxic PFAS Chemicals

A new report has found that eating a single freshwater fish is the same as drinking dangerous PFAS chemicals for an entire month. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.

Check out our merch by visiting our store

Subscribe to our podcast

Become a member today!

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel

Be sociable! Follow us on:

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

A new report's found that eating a single freshwater fish is the same as drinking dangerous PFAS chemicals. Okay. First of all, most people don't know what PFAS is. You, do you agree with that?

Oh, absolutely.

It's been knocking around out there. We tried the first case, the first time PFAS ever got into the public domain were the trials that I had up in West Virginia. They made two movies out of it. One was called The Devil We Know, it's on Netflix. The other one was about the lawyer who brought the case to me, brilliant lawyer, named Rob, Rob Bilott. It's called Dark Waters. Begin by watching those movies to understand how bad this is. Okay. PFAS is so dangerous that, if you take one drop, one drop, put it in an Olympic size pool, it's going to have the propensity to cause the physical problems that the, that we're talking about. Which are what?

We're talking about neurological problems, cancers of every imaginable kind for the individuals, birth defects. And, and the big problem here too, and you've discussed this plenty of times, is that it's bioaccumulative.

Mm-hmm.

Which means once it gets in you, it's in you. So every PFAS chemical you drink after that is just compiling and building up inside your system.

And explain why it's in fish. Explain why it's in our drinking water. Talk about that.

Exactly. It's, it's the waste from these massive corporations that have been dumping it for decades. Our, our EPA right now still doesn't know exactly if we're gonna stop this because it's still happening. They're still debating on what the proper limits are, but there's no limit.

50 years. 50 years the EPA has known that PFAS, the first cases we tried was C8. It was a type of PFAS. So, so we found the documents, the EPA understood that all of the rat studies were a disaster. All of the beagle studies, they all died. All the monkey studies, they all died. And it was caused by this stuff that is in our drinking water right now. The second phase of this case that we're handling right now is all these drinking water facilities. The, the delivery facilities. They have so much PFAS in their water it would take a hundred to $200 million per facility to get it out of the water.

And so now what we're looking at, this new study from the Environmental Working Group says, one freshwater fish, just one, if you were to eat that right now for lunch, that's the equivalent of drinking nothing but PFAS basically for an entire month, one fish. And these freshwater fish they're talking about, these supply foods to, to communities. They're a huge source of food for low income Americans who always bear the brunt of all of these environmental toxins.

Mm-hmm.

Native populations. All of these groups heavily dependent on these fish. And we're finding out now we're poisoning you even faster than the rest of us are being poisoned. Because everybody's getting it, but they're getting it worse.

You wanna know how it happened? You know what came out in the trial? Okay. It's 3M and DuPont were the big, big folks in this. They did all this testing. They saw that all the tests were a disaster causing kidney cancer, causing testicular cancer, causing neurological problems, causing birth defects. All of this information they had. Now for a little while, they hid it from the EPA. But then at some point they handed it over to the EPA. EPA did nothing. They, they, there was nothing that was done by the EPA. All right. Working Groups, Environmental Working Groups gave it to the media. Don't you think, this was like, this was 40 years ago. Don't you think this is an important story New York Times? Don't you think this is important Washington Post?

It should be.

No, it wasn't because obviously advertising money was moving into those entities.