Trump Shares Post About Releasing Terrorists Near Supreme Court Justices’ Homes

One of Donald Trump’s closest allies, Mike Davis, put a post on Truth Social suggesting that the administration should release “terrorists” near the homes and frequent haunts of Supreme Court justices since they aren’t ruling in Trump’s favor. Trump himself REPOSTED this message through his own Truth Social account, showing that he might actually be open to the idea. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins explains what happened.

Subscribe to stay connected to our stories

Support us by becoming a member on YouTube

Or Support us on Patreon

Buy Ring of Fire merch

Find us on social media!

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

Every couple of weeks a conservative lawyer and former GOP staffer by the name of Mike Davis makes the news for posting some of the weirdest, craziest, and most dangerous things we have ever seen on social media. But this time it's not just about what Davis posted, it's about who reposted it, because the person who reposted it was Donald Trump to his very own truth social account. And what he reposted from Mike Davis was this, the Supreme Court still has an illegal injunction on the President of the United States preventing him from commanding military operations to expel these foreign terrorists. The president should house these terrorists near the Chevy Chase Country Club with daytime release. Now, Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts and many other prominent people, most of them in politics are members of the Chevy Chase Country Club. But basically what he's calling for is, okay, if the Supreme Court's not gonna play ball with Donald Trump, if they're gonna rule against him illegally, which for the record, it technically can't even be classified as illegal if it is a ruling from the Supreme Court. So learn your facts, buddy. Um, but he's calling for the terrorists, which aren't even actually terrorists to be released near the places where Supreme Court justices are known to frequent, you know, in the hopes that one of these people will kill a Supreme Court justice. Let's be crystal clear, right? Let's not dance around what you're trying to imply here, because that is what you're trying to imply. Let's put these people in danger so maybe something horrible happens to them. That's what you're doing and Trump reposted it, folks.

Then you had former Obama speech writer, John Favreau, not the actor, but the former speech writer. He said this in response to Davis's Post. He said, the president reposts a suggestion from an advisor that he released terrorists near the homes of Supreme Court Justices who've merely ruled that the government can't send people to a foreign gulag without due process. So Mike Davis then saw this post from John Favreau and said this, yes, we should send these Maryland fathers where they will feel safe and protected, wealthy, white, liberal enclaves like Chevy Chase and Martha's Vineyard instead of working class minority neighborhoods like Aurora. Then let's see how much due process you liberals want. We, we still want due process. Um, for the record, we're not saying that all of these people are the greatest people in the world. We're just saying the Constitution says they have to have a day in court. Let's not shred the Constitution just because it takes a little longer that way. That's all we're saying. And if you have a problem with it, then you have a problem with the very foundation upon which the

United States was built, in which case you should be the one getting the out of the country for good. Mike, if you have a problem with the Constitution and you are unwilling to abide by it, then leave. Get out right now and don't ever come back. But you don't get to shred it and ignore it and disobey it just because it doesn't suit your whims. I mean, hell, if that was the case, then Jesus next liberal president we get, might come around, ignore the Second Amendment and scoop up all your guns. Right? Y'all conservatives been saying that for decades. It's never happened. But if we're in the process of just dismantling the Constitution, why not start there, right? Ah, see how I turn the tables on you? All of a sudden, suddenly it doesn't seem like such a good idea to you conservatives to shred the Constitution because you do it for one amendment.