June 2, 2025
13,177
1,049
94
8.67%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:01Now PlayingWe have reports coming out that the Make America Healthy Again report, this landmark report that we were all promised, is filled with AI hallucinations, reports, citations to things that never happened. Recently, Secretary Kennedy stated they are very aggressively implementing AI and that they were going to use AI to speed up clinical trials. This is a problem that affects the health of 334 million Americans if we cannot trust anything this government body is telling us.
Subscribe to stay connected to our stories
Support us by becoming a member on YouTube
Or Support us on Patreon
Buy Ring of Fire merch
Find us on social media!
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
So we have reports coming out that the Make America Healthy Again report, this landmark report that we were all promised has all these AI hallucinations, these reports, citations to things that never happened. Interestingly recently, Secretary Kennedy stated to lawmakers, we are very, very aggressively implementing AI. We brought very, very high quality caliber people from Silicon Valley, and that they were going to use AI to speed up clinical trials. Apparently, one way they can do that is by hallucinating evidence.
Yeah. You know, we don't need to be aggressively having AI involved in any kind of drug trials or anything because they can't even get citations right. And that's what these AI experts have told us about this MAHA report. They look at the links, the studies that are cited, and they've noticed what they're calling, I believe may be pronounced oaicites, but it's o-a-i-cites. And what those are, are clear indications that the AI could not find a particular citation, they couldn't back something up. So what it does is it creates them. It basically works on the assumption that the prompt knows what it's talking about, or the author directing it knew what they were talking about. So it backs it up with this hallucination, as you say, that doesn't exist, but it's based on the assumption that this person knows what they're trying to say.
So it is a weird thing that does happen with AI. We've seen it with lawyers. Lawyers get busted using AI to write briefs because the AI is citing cases that never existed. So that is one of the massive, massive flaws of AI today, is trying to create fake things to justify whatever the prompt is. And in this case, you have the nation's largest healthcare oversight body that can't even be trusted to write their own reports or to have actual information to back their points up and that's what we're dealing with. That is the part that is of course, exceptionally dangerous for the public, is this department doesn't seem to even know what they're talking about and they're clearly making things up.
The White House came out and said, there's some errors, there's some citation errors and some minor things, and they're gonna clean it up, they did clean it up. But my understanding is there's still problems with the report and they were still using AI to write this thing. You would think someone in the organization would think to proofread it before, especially after you got caught the first time using AI. And to your point, law firms around the country, both plaintiff and defense attorneys have been sanctioned by courts for using AI to submit briefs. Essentially it seems like a lot of professionals in this country think, well, I don't have to write it anymore. I can use AI. And AI is clearly not up to the task.
Right. I recently had some blood work done at my doctor's office, and when I get the results in the app they have, it says, this report was created with AI. It's like, okay, well no, this is kind of the thing I really want a human being to look at, my blood test results and explain to me what's happening. So it is really across the board and that is very unfortunate because AI is not where it needs to be yet to be able to do these functions. And yeah, the courts are taking care of the lawyers that are doing it. That's great. But in this, the medical profession and the healthcare profession, when you have the major watchdog of that, HHS going right along with it and then as you said, oh, we'll fix it and they put in more fake studies.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.