Aydin Paladin
@aydinpaladin·140K subscribers·292 videos
Robust Feminist Research Retracted : How a Hoax Helped Heal Academia
Posted
October 11, 2018
Views
56,961
Likes
3,188
Comments
454
Engagement
6.39%
October 11, 2018
56,961
3,188
454
6.39%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
44:38Now PlayingA trio of academics recently made headlines with a series of papers published in various feminist, critical-cultural, and post-modern research journals having been revealed as farcical, further revealing the absurd state of academic publication and crumbling of the credibility of the ivory tower. The three have been both lauded and lambasted for the hoaxes, with many claiming it to be an unethical stunt, motivated by politics, in an attempt to discredit robust feminist scholarship. Is that so? Even if it is unethical, is it potentially necessary sometimes to bend the rules, so as to bend the mirror back unto those who need take, perhaps, a closer look at their own fields of study? Let's examine the papers published as a part of this project and discuss the morality and potential necessity of the contributions it may have made toward the the health of academia, being is such a sorry state as it may often appear.
You can Gibsmedat here:
Merch Store:
References
Baldwin, R. (2018). An Ethnography of Breastaurant Masculinity: Themes of Objectification, Sexual Conquest, Male Control, and Masculine Toughness in a Sexually Objectifying Restaurant. Sex Roles.
Baldwin, R. (2018). Who are they to judge? Overcoming anthropometry through fat bodybuilding. Fat Studies, 1–13.
Baldwin, R. (2018). When the Joke Is on You: A Feminist Perspective on How Positionality Influences Satire. Hypatia
De Craene, V. (2017). Fucking geographers! Or the epistemological consequences of neglecting the lusty researcher’s body. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(3), 449–464.
Epstein, W. M. (1990). Confirmational response bias among social work journals. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(1), 9–38.
Gonzales, M., & Jones. L.A., (2018). Our struggle is my struggle: Solidarity feminism as an intersectional reply to neoliberal and choice feminism. Affilia.
Lloro-Bidart, Teresa. 2017. “When ‘Angelino’ Squirrels Don’t Eat Nuts: A Feminist Posthumanist Politics of Consumption across Southern California.” Gender, Place, and Culture 24 (6): 753–773.
Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1:161-75
Masood, A. (2017). Negotiating mobility in gendered spaces: case of Pakistani women doctors. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(2), 188–206.
Miller, C. (2018). Moon meetings and the meaning of sisterhood: A poetic portrayal of lived feminist spirituality. Journal of Poetry Therapy.
Peters, D. P., and S. J. Ceci. (1982). Peer review practice of psychological journals: The fate of published articles submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187-95.
Smith, M. (2018). Going in through the back door: Challenging straight male homohysteria and transphobia through receptive penetrative sex toy use. Sexuality and Society, 1-19.
Sokal, A.D. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text. 46–47: 217–252.
Full Project Report
Additional Links
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
