April 14, 2026
25,615
1,349
891
8.74%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
45:00Now PlayingOriginal Episode Here
Peter from Pennsylvania calls in to argue that God isn't evil for not curing cancer. Justin and Ian push back hard, with Ian arguing that moral responsibility scales with how easy something is to do, and for an omnipotent God, curing cancer is trivially easy. What follows is a 43-minute philosophical free-for-all about moral obligation, what "all good" actually means, and whether God is exempt from ethics entirely. Peter insists that "all good" means ontological completeness, not moral performance — Ian says that's not what the word means. The call ends with a wallet theft thought experiment that Peter insists doesn't contain the logical contradiction Ian says it obviously does.
SUPPORT THE NETWORK
---------------------------------------------------
Become a Channel Member
Send A Super Thanks (In Comments)
SUPPORT PRODUCTION
---------------------------------------------------
Amazon Wishlist
MORE LIVE SHOWS & CLIPS
---------------------------------------------------
CONTACT US
---------------------------------------------------
contact@qnaline.com
HOSTS
---------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS
---------------------------------------------------
The Line
110 N Interstate 35
Suite 315-1027
Round Rock, TX 78681
United States
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.