April 26, 2026
26,617
1,941
1,088
11.38%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
17:40Now PlayingOriginal Episode Here
Samuel from Spain calls in with a philosophical argument for God's existence — the modal ontological argument — delivered so fast he's clearly hoping no one catches the premises. Ian catches every single one. The argument collapses in minutes when Ian points out that a necessary being could be mathematics, not God, and that defining your way to God's existence proves nothing. Samuel never recovers, spending the rest of the call fabricating citations, using slurs, and asking gotcha questions he doesn't understand himself. When pushed to state plainly whether he believes in a God with a mind, he says no. Just a necessary thing. Ian and Justin close by agreeing that the underlying argument is actually interesting — it's just a shame Samuel wasn't capable of having that conversation.
SUPPORT THE NETWORK
---------------------------------------------------
Become a Channel Member
Send A Super Thanks (In Comments)
SUPPORT PRODUCTION
---------------------------------------------------
Amazon Wishlist
MORE LIVE SHOWS & CLIPS
---------------------------------------------------
CONTACT US
---------------------------------------------------
contact@qnaline.com
HOSTS
---------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS
---------------------------------------------------
The Line
110 N Interstate 35
Suite 315-1027
Round Rock, TX 78681
United States
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.