Supreme Court Justices Will "Punish" Liberals Over Protests
July 11, 2022
49,540
2,975
550
7.12%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Ring of Fire Episodes Around July 11, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:11Now PlayingSupreme Court Justices Will "Punish" Liberals Over Protests
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelA majority of Americans say that it is time for term limits for Supreme Court justices. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Find our merchandise at Teespring
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
A majority Americans say that it's time for term limits for the Supreme Court. This ties right into what I'm talking about. As you watch this discussion, rather than, look, there are so many great reasons to talk about this being a bad decision, but it doesn't start off with let's do away with this Supreme Court. Let's start a super majority requirement for the Supreme Court. You see the problem there, right?
Yeah.
It's just, who's in power at the time. Right now, it's the Democrats and they, this would be good for the Democrats in their mind. A, it's never gonna happen. B, all it does is creates this possibility that if it does happen, the next party that's gonna be in charge are gonna be the, gonna be the Republicans. I don't, I don't get that logic.
Listen, I, I, I've, I've always been a big fan of term limits.
Yeah.
Not just for the Supreme Court and every federal court, but for Congress as well.
Yeah.
And, and I think a lot of these members of Congress who have literally no idea who they're talking to on any given day, according to reports, they're a great argument for term limits.
Mm-hmm.
And this is where the country needs to go. And I'm glad we're finally starting to see people wake up because yeah, you've got, I mean, Clarence Thomas was appointed by George H W Bush.
Mm-hmm, mm-hmm.
He has been on that court for 31 years, an entire generation.
Yeah.
On that court. And time's up, buddy. And you got a lot of other ones too that have just been there for far too long. They hang on for too long. And most importantly, they lose touch with what actually happens in the real world. And to me, that's the biggest problem, not just with justices, but with the politicians, too.
Articles that are coming out and they make a lot of sense to me, if you're a Supreme Court judge, you're Kav, let's say you're Kavanaugh. You have been attacked while you were going through the process, justifiably so on a lot of issues. You've had now this, this outcry about, you know, it's okay to, I mean, he had his family at risk. You understand that the man's family was at risk by some leftwinger who believed it was a good idea to go carry a gun and threaten the family. With, with Thomas right now, whether you dis, whether you agree with them or not, I'm not even talking about, do you agree.
Yeah.
We, we don't agree with most of that.
Right.
But if you're Clarence Thomas, you now, you have your wife under attack. You're under attack. You're being called everything in the world. And at some point, what effect does that have on a, on a Supreme Court judge, when you have limitless power to do what you wanna do, do you think that's a good idea?
No. I mean, you're absolutely right about that. And look, we got an interview from the New York Times from 1993, where Thomas' clerk said his goal because what he went through during his confirmation, his goal was.
To get back, to get even.
For the next, yeah, next 43 years make liberals lives miserable. That is what he said.
That's what, well, that's my point.
Yeah.
That's my point. And so you're a Supreme Court judge, whoever, whoever you are, you know, whether you're Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, it doesn't make any difference. You're under this attack from the left. How can you not get to the point to where you hate them so badly that every chance you can take, everything you can do to shut 'em down, you're gonna do? I don't know, I don't know a living breathing human being that this doesn't have an effect on. And I don't know why people don't see that.
Well, and, and not to mention, you also know that you can do this with really no oversight whatsoever.
Yeah.
You know, we, we've never actually impeached a Supreme Court justice here in the United States, at least not impeached and removed. So they.
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









