August 1, 2024
788
31
11
5.33%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
55:46Now PlayingMain Chapters:
Over 50 million watched the June 2024 debate between Biden and Trump. The debate sank Biden's re-election prospects, but there are still important insights to be gained about how both men’s brains are functioning.
In terms of psychiatric diagnoses, the debates supplement a large body of evidence that:
- Both men show decrements in verbal abilities in excess of healthy aging
- Both men continue to display extensive symptoms of ADHD
- Trump takes stimulant medications to enhance his performances
- Biden displays multiple symptoms of Parkinsonism
- Trump’s excessive falsehoods are consistent with narcissism
But why is it ethically appropriate to comment on these psychiatric conclusions?
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) and other professional groups claim that publicly discussing the mental health of public figures is unethical without an in-person evaluation and the individual’s consent. But no confidentiality is being betrayed by discussing information widely accessible in the public domain.
The APA asserts, despite evidence to the contrary, that an in-person evaluation is the gold standard for a psychiatric evaluation. Research shows that viewing videos of an individual’s behavior can result in accurate and valid psychiatric diagnoses. Compared to what one can obtain in an in-person evaluation, we have far more hours of behavioral evidence on video for both men, in a variety of settings, interacting with numerous individuals, at different times of day, over a more extensive period of time. We have far more corroboration of this information, from far more sources, than one can accumulate with an in-person evaluation.
Furthermore, diagnostic criteria for ADHD, unlike other mental health conditions are based entirely on observable behaviors, without requiring knowledge of a subject’s feelings, motivations, or other internal mental states. Thus we can attain greater certainty in making an ADHD diagnosis than for a personality disorder. Similarly, many of the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are observable behaviors.
Although medical professionals’ primary obligation is to their patients, it has been long recognized that doctors have social responsibilities as well. It is a disservice to a democracy to allow ignorant and partisan voices to dominate the conversation about the health of its potential leaders. Psychiatry has an ethical obligation to say what it knows, how it knows this, and its degree of certainty regarding conclusions about the mental health of presidential candidates.
-----
My book on Recognizing Adult ADHD:
Recognizing Adult ADHD: What Donald Trump Can Teach Us About Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Free link to my Medium Article on the Trump / Biden Debate and Mental health:
Follow on Medium for hundreds of full length articles on this subject and more!
Access to other Medium articles requires paid membership.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
My interview with David Pakman before the Presidential debate:
-----
References:
The Goldwater Rule: Perspectives From, and Implications for, Psychological Science (2020):
A Systematic Review on the Reliability and Validity of Semistructured Diagnostic Interviews for Borderline Personality Disorder:
Parkinson's Organization Fact Sheet:
Full Chapter List:
Streamed live July 3, 2024
#health #mentalhealth #trump #biden