January 14, 2022
409
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
4:49Now PlayingThe Supreme Court has found that a real estate developer is liable to reimburse homebuyers for increased taxes and other costs that they are forced to pay in the absence of an occupation certificate (OC), in a judgement that advances the latter's interests under consumer protection law. A court led by Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud ruled that a homebuyer is a "customer" under the consumer protection statute since a builder's failure to secure an occupation certificate is considered a "deficiency in service" under the law. The court also dismissed the notion that a developer cannot be held liable because it does not collect municipal taxes or electricity rates as a service provider.
SUBSCRIBE NOW for more such videos ►
For More Updates ►
Like us on Facebook ►
Follow us on Twitter ►
Follow us on Instagram ►
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.