June 21, 2021
123,346
7,403
1,104
6.90%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
3:46Now PlayingOfficials at the EPA have finally come clean and admitted that they had altered scientific data about the dangers of certain pesticides during the Trump administration. The debate over the safety of certain pesticides is one that brewed behind the scenes during the Trump administration, and it got buried by the numerous scandals that captured the headlines. But we now know the lengths that this administration was willing to go to in order to appease big business. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins discusses this.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Find our merchandise at Teespring
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Officials at the United States environmental protection agency finally admitted recently that yeah, when Donald Trump was president, we were essentially forced to alter scientific data to fit their agenda. Specifically, these individuals were talking about three pesticides that included Dicamba. Now, if you're not familiar with Dicamba, I do encourage you, go ahead and do a search through our YouTube channel here for the word Dicamba. We have done multiple segments on it. It is a horribly toxic pesticide linked to all sorts of cancers in human beings, and the thing should be banned. And that was effectively what the EPA had said in their data. They said Dicamba is not safe enough to use because of all of the health problems it causes in human beings.
But because the Trump administration wanted Dicamba approved for some reason, I don't even know. I mean, that's what drives me crazy about stories like this too, is there's not even a clear reason why Trump was like, oh hell no, we gotta have Dicamba. Okay. You're, you're, you're not in the pesticide industry. Like this isn't a thing that affects you financially. So why the hell are you pushing so hard for it? That makes no sense to me and I want answers on that and I'm sure there's answers out there. We just have to find them. But anyway, Trump says, nope, I want Dicamba. So the EPA scientists or officials had to go back and say, okay, well, we've got these reports, let's change this. Let's alter this. Let's delete this. This is what they've admitted to doing.
Let's do all of this because the man wants it done, because we have to get this deadly toxic pesticide out there in the United States, cancer be damned. We're going to do this. And they did. Now immediately upon taking office, Joe Biden did create the scientific integrity task force, that's actually how we know that this happened now, because that's their job. This little task force is meant to go through and make sure there's no politization, there is no, I guess, industry influence in decisions. Although we know there still will be. It's a good start and it's desperately needed, but the damage is being done already. The damage is already being done and the damage is going to continue to be done the next time a Republican takes over the White House, which might be in four years.
Science is not political. Data is data. Numbers are numbers and science is science. But here in the United States in a way that we truly don't see in the rest of the world, maybe Australia, they're pretty bad with it too, but we've actually politicized it. The rejection of science is a Republican fundamental at this point. Acceptance of science on issues like climate change, to a degree, it's Democratic one. Democrats are still a little torn on fracking, even though they shouldn't be, fracking should be banned outright. End of story, period. But this is where we are. And in the meantime, people are contracting these horrible cancers, some of them incurable and dying from them, because we as a country decided to politicize science.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.