June 4, 2021
89,595
5,757
987
7.53%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
5:31Now PlayingRepublican Party Chair Ronna Romney McDaniel issued a warning to the Commission on Presidential Debates this week: Either play by OUR rules, or our candidate (whoever that may be) likely won't participate in 2024. Republicans are still pretending that they are the victims of some form of unfair practices from the 2020 election, but this refusal will only hurt them in the next election. Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!
Connect with Farron on Twitter
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
Ronna Romney McDaniel. The chairwoman of the Republican national committee issued, I guess what could be called a warning shot to the commission on presidential debates this week when she told them that if you don't play by our rules, then I'm going to tell whoever the 2024 Republican candidate it is that they should sit out the presidential debate Bates.
Now McDaniel is once
Again, repeating the false talking points from Donald Trump from 2020, that somehow the presidential debate commission is unfair that it's biased towards the Democrats or the liberals or the Progressive's that could not be further from the truth. You typically have far more, right? Leaning moderators than you do left leaning ones,
But Donald Trump,
But still off. And so the rest of the Republican party has to be off with him about the fact that after the first presidential debate last fall, Donald Trump was diagnosed with COVID-19 because of that, the second debate, uh, they wanted to move to a virtual format. So that way you keep everybody safe, right? I mean, we're in the middle of a pandemic. We still get to have the debate. You just not on stage with one another. Sure. Why is that not good enough? Well, Trump, I said, no,
He said, I'm not doing that. I'm not doing a debate. So
I'm sitting this one out. And so they said, okay, well, Joe Biden, if, uh, we got the time blocked off. If you, if you want to come and just do it, just we'll do it. And he did. And it worked out extremely well for Joe Biden. And of course that Donald Trump off. He showed up to the next debate and you know, it is what it is. But the debate commission gave him every opportunity to participate, offered him the same thing and he refused to do it because he's such a whiny little baby. And his windingness apparently is some kind of disease that is now infecting the rest of the party, including Ronna Romney, McDaniel. So what are her demands? Right? What does she want out of this debate commission? Here it is. She wants at least one debate scheduled to take place before early voting begins. All right. Whatever. I understand that. Sure. She also called on the commission to, for presidential debates to establish transparent criteria for the selection of moderators and a code of conduct for them echoing Trump's criticism about members of the media being selected to moderate debates, who the hell do you think is going to do it right? That's, that's kind of what these people do for a living. Look. I don't like him either, regardless of what side they're
On, everybody's biased,
But they, they, I also know what they're doing. And for the most part, even some of the conservative ones, uh, have done a good job of trying to remain nonpartisan and just asking the questions. Nobody really cares about the moderator except the people that Saturday night live. So they can mock it that coming weekend, uh, said the RNC wants term limits for the CPBS board directors, which was designed to be bipartisan, include members of both parties.
Um, weird, but Oak. Okay. I mean, whatever
McDaniel asked that the CPB reply to her request by the end of July. Now I will say again, doing a debate before the early voting begins. I understand the importance of that because last year, all of the debates took place after early voting had begun. So, but
If you're going to vote that early, you already know who you're gonna vote for.
Let's be honest. Most people watch these debates knowing full well, which candidate they're going to support. I mean really how many people actually watch these things with a critical eye saying, Hmm. Okay. Well, that's interesting. I had no idea who these people were. I don't know. Maybe I'm so deep into the political world. That, that seems weird to me. Maybe most people are like that. I understand. And the primary, sure. The primary is you get to know these people, you get to see who is a fraud and who isn't. That's how Marco Rubio, uh, had his campaign go down in flames with the Republicans in 2015. That's how a lot of the other Democrats were exposed as not knowing
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.